Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:37

Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Former church in Northern Kentucky now a heavenly home for sale - WWMT
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Carrying own bag after splitting with caddie, Max Homa fails to qualify for U.S. Open - NBC Sports
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
What are the top 10 online courses for high-income AI skills in 2024?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
For what reasons would lawyers hesitate to use a legal AI product?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
China Considers Ordering Hundreds of Airbus Jets in Major Deal - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
5 Things to Know Before the Stock Market Opens - Investopedia
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are some funny stories of people calling 911 for non-emergencies?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.